
"I will destroy you. Even on the bench."
(Note: At the very least, this post is intended to be taken lightly, as a source of amusement. At most, it’s meant to be taken as a ray of hope for Twins fans. I hope you enjoy.)
This week, Twins fans received tragic news. Justin Morneau, out for the season with a back fracture. Out. Back fracture. Crap.
It’s easy to forget what life was like before Morneau came into the big leagues. It’s easy to forget because people inevitably take for granted things that are the best for them, be it employers, spouses, friends or just sports fans. It’s easy to forget because Morneau has been a ROCK at first base, playing in 612 of 633 possible games since the beginning of 2006. It’s easy to forget because of the consistent, almost monotonous, run production Morneau has given the Twins every month for the past three-plus years:
| RBI’s per month |
2006 |
2007 |
2008 |
2009 |
| April |
15 |
15 |
22 |
18 |
| May |
21 |
29 |
20 |
29 |
| June |
29 |
17 |
21 |
17 |
| July |
23 |
28 |
23 |
19 |
| August |
22 |
7 |
22 |
13 |
| September/Oct. |
20 |
15 |
21 |
4 |
Obviously, RBI don’t begin to tell an accurate picture of Morneau’s talent, but they do show that he has been the guy on this team who has driven in runs with remarkable consistency, at a truly elite rate. There’s no question that losing Morneau’s bat is going to hurt the Twins’ run production.
What is left to be seen, however, is what this injury is going to do to the Twins’ chemistry and fire. The Twins have been known to exceed expectations when counted out (see 2002 – 2004, 2006, 2008) and disappoint in years when they were expected to do well (see 2005, 2007, 2009 (up to this point, anyway)). On that note, I’d like to introduce (or re-introduce) everyone to The Ewing Theory. (Skeptics, I encourage you to bear with me.)
The Ewing Theory was originally developed by Dave Cirilli and explained by renowned ESPN Sports Columnist Bill Simmons. To apply the Ewing theory, two conditions need to be met:
- A star athlete receives an inordinate amount of media attention and fan interest, and yet his teams never win anything substantial with him (other than maybe some early-round playoff series).
- That same athlete leaves his team (either by injury, trade, graduation, free agency or retirement) — and both the media and fans immediately write off the team for the following season.
When those two conditions are met, the Ewing Theory is in play, and the theory is that the team that loses a star player inevitably rallies around the bad luck and corresponding fatalism of the media and fans and out-performs expectations to a substantial level. The best example of the Ewing theory was its eponymous origin, when Patrick Ewing tore his Achilles tendon in the Eastern Conference Finals against Indiana in 1999. Written off for dead against Rik Smits and the Pacers, the Knicks won three of the next four games and advanced to the NBA Finals. Simmons also documents examples of the Ewing Theory in play in baseball, if you care to peruse a classic internet article.
So, what to think of the Ewing theory? Is this tenable? Sure, it seems logical enough that role players could step up their game, focus a little harder, and players with raw potential may happen to realize that potential at just the right moment and string together good play, thus carrying a team beyond expectations. After all, a full team is stronger than one player. Of course, it’s not really testable, or if it is testable, I don’t really care to test it. I just care whether or not it’s going to apply to the Twins this year. And I think there’s a reason it could.
First, the two pre-conditions are satisfied. While maybe not fitting the first condition perfectly (Mauer would be a true Ewing Theory situation (please GOD NO!)), Morneau fits it well enough. After all, he is a “star athlete”. A cynical fan could say that Morneau receives an “inordinate amount of media attention and fan interest”. Despite his consistently gaudy numbers, the Twins have never had a sustained post-season run, and Morneau is notorious for fading down the stretch when the team needs him most. From a baseball perspective, Morneau is an incredible talent. From a fan’s perspective, which cares first and foremost about winning, Morneau is suspect. (I don’t necessarily endorse that view; I’m just saying that, for purposes of the Ewing Theory, it works.)
The second pre-condition obviously fits the scenario. Morneau has left the team (with injury). Media and fans have taken this as a nail in the coffin. “Bad Trumps Good,” read the Star Tribune’s headline after the news broke. Fan blogs signaled doom for the team. Crowds at the Metrodome have dwindled. Both the fans and media took the news badly: this team was in trouble.
Now, the Ewing Theory doesn’t just happen by itself. The players have to make it happen, and I would add the following to the Ewing Theory. Not only do players have to make it happen, but they have to be properly positioned to allow their talents to be absolutely maximized. That is, if Morneau is out for the season, you can’t plug Matt Tolbert into the fourth spot and expect him to step up for Morneau. The change has to happen in multiple areas, in ways that maximize the things that players are good at. With that in mind, let’s consider what the Morneau injury does to the Twins.
First: Ironically, Morneau’s injury should improve the outfield defense. Michael
Cuddyer has been pulled in from right field, leaving the Twins with a presumable everyday outfield of Delmon Young in left, Carlos Gomez in center, and Denard Span in right. Young subbing for Cuddyer is a slight downgrade in outfield defense, according to FanGraphs UZR data, but that is more than offset by the improvement of having Gomez and Span in center and right, converting basically any flyball in play into an out. Morneau being out obviously hurts the offense; still, the defense should be better, which should take some pressure off the offense. (Of course, Gardenhire has so far put Kubel in right in order to DH Brian Buscher and Joe Mauer; the jury is still out on whether this plays out.)
Second: Morneau’s injury gives Young and Gomez the potential to bat every day. With young, inexperienced batters, everyday play is especially important. It gives the player a chance to work on their mistakes daily. Also, it takes some of the edge off. A player need not worry about possibly being benched because of a bad game. With Young and Gomez knowing they should have everyday playing time, they can relax and play a bit more freely. Hopefully, this relaxed atmosphere, combined with the incentive to step up in Morneau’s absence, will result in improved offensive production.
Third: Michael Cuddyer. Critical to the Ewing Theory is the intangible fact that the team rallies around adversity and uses that adversity to motivate themselves and exceed expectations. In short, the Ewing Theory feeds off team chemistry. Michael Cuddyer is the consummate chemistry guy, from his hand-bruising high-fives to his overall infectious good nature, Cuddyer is the perfect player to foster the team chemistry necessary to make the Ewing Theory work. Now, of course Cuddyer isn’t literally replacing Morneau in the lineup. He was formerly playing every day, and hasn’t even taken Morneau’s spot in the lineup. Still, he’s now playing first base. Any Twins player is going to miss seeing Morneau over there. Seeing Chemistry Cuddy over there takes a lot of that sting off.
I really don’t mean to rip Morneau here. I’m devastated that he won’t be playing the last few weeks. There’s no reason to think he couldn’t have turned it on the last few weeks and been the difference for this team (well, aside from the fact that his back was fractured). I think complaints of his late-season fades are over-blown and largely coincidental. At the same time, a fan has to look at this and see the opportunities resulting from this injury. The outfield defense should be better (I’m counting on you, Gardy). Gomez and Young have a chance to prove their “potential” and step up in a huge way. And the Twins couldn’t ask for a better chemistry guy to facilitate all this than Michael Cuddyer. It’s a long shot, but the Twins have been counted long shots before. For almost a decade now, they’ve at least given us a reason to watch.